. 2019; 16(2): 0-0

Optimization Of Thiazolidone Scaffolds Using Pocket Modelling For Development Of Potential Secretary System Inhibitors of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis

Prafulla Balkrishna Choudhari1, Shivaratna V Khare1, Siddharth P Phalle1, Santosh S Kumbhar1, Sambhaji Masal1, Rakesh P Dhavale3, Durgacharan A Bhagwat3, Atual M Kadam4, Sujata P Choudahri2
1Computational Chemistry Research Lab, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Pharmacy, Kolhapur
2Department of Pharmaceutics, Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Pharmacy, Kolhapur
3Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Sarojini College of Pharmacy, Rajendra Nagar, Kolhapur
4Department of Pharmaceutics Shree Santkrupa College of Pharmacy, Ghogaon

INTRODUCTION: Objectives: Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a causative organism of tuberculosis, which is most lethal disease after cancer in a current decade. The development of multidrug and broadly drug-resistant strains making the tuberculosis problem more and more critical. In last 40 years, only one molecule is added to the treatment regimen. Generally, drug design and development programs are targeted proteins whose function is known to be essential to the bacterial cell. M. tuberculosis possesses specialized protein export systems like SecA2 export pathway and ESX pathways.
Material and methods: In the present communication, rational development of anti-mycobacterial agent's targeting protein export system has been carried out by integrating the pocket modeling and virtual analysis.
Results: The identified potential 23 lead compounds were synthesized, characterized by physicochemical and spectroscopic methods like IR, NMR spectroscopy and further screened for anti-mycobacterial activity using isoniazid as standard. All the designed compounds have shown profound anti-mycobacterial activity.
Conclusion: In this present communication, we found that M26, U8, and R26 molecules had significant desirable biological activity and specific interactions with Sec of mycobacteria. Further optimization of these leads is necessary for the development of potential anti-mycobacterial drug candidate less side effects.
METHODS: . Experimental
2.1 Selection of Target:
Mycobacterium tuberculosis is three specialized protein export systems like SEC, TAT, and ESX. Secondary translocase pathway (SEC) is major protein export systems of MTB, which export bulk of virulent protein, which accounts for the spread of disease. SEC systems are not having any homologs in mammalian systems, so inhibition of this SEC will not lead to any toxicity to the human being. Thus due to the critical role of the SEC in the growth and virulence of the MTB, SEC has been selected as preferred biomolecular target than TAT and ESX
2.2 Pocket modeling of selected protein export systems;
Pocket modeling of the selected SEC of MTB was carried out using crystal structure of SEC downloaded from the free protein database www.rcsb.org. Downloaded crystal structure of SEC (PDBID 1QNX) was first refined using biopredicta molecule, via removal of water molecules and retaining native hydrogen atoms in the protein structure. Pocket modeling of SEC A is carried out using proviz module of Vlife MDS 4.4. Proviz is integrated property visualization module using which electrostatic and hydrophobic mapping of biomolecules can be carried out.
2.3 Design of molecules:
Pocket modeling of the SEC revealed the binding pocket of SEC is U shaped and highly hydrophobic, keeping in mind complementary structures on thiazole template were designed with structural modification on the aromatic moiety has been carried out. A number of the aromatic benzaldehyde are utilized to generate number of thiazole derivatives. Total 75X75 benzaldehyde combinations are utilized to generate total 5625 different structures (indicated as R) as shown in table 1. These 5625 different thiazole derivatives were designed and drawn in 2D geometry using builder module of the Vlife MDS 4.4. 2D structures are converted into the 3D geometry and their coordinates were optimized via energy minimization process via application of Merck molecular force field (MMFF)
2.4. Docking analysis of synthesized ligands
Molecular docking was performed to identify potent derivatives with the maximum binding affinity for SEC of MTB amongst the designed set of molecules. Docking analysis was performed in the biopredicta module of the Vlife MDS 4.4 using grip based docking analysis in which protein structure was kept rigid and molecules are kept the flexible conformation so that number of conformation can be achieved. Best 100 confirmation of the each designed molecules were generated. Potent molecules were scrutinized based on binding energy and interaction profile. The proposed synthetic scheme of designed derivatives is shown in Fig. 1.
2.5. Screening based on the drug-like properties and percentage absorption.
Designed set of molecules were analyzed for Lipinski parameters like molecular weight, H-bond acceptor, H-bond donor, Rotatable bond, XlogP etc. The physicochemical descriptors calculated with the help of QSAR module of Vlife MDS 4.4. Total polar surface area (TPSA) calculated from the web server www. molinspiration.com/cgi-bin/properties by drawing the molecules in drawing area then calculates the TPSA. Percentage absorption was calculated by using the formula, % Absorption = 109 - (0.345 x TPSA).21


Table No. 1: Designed set of molecules (Total 75X75 benzaldehyde combinations are utilized to generate total 5625 different structures indicated as R)
Sr. no. R Sr. no. R Sr. no. R Sr. no. R
1. C6H5 2. 4- (CH3)2 N-C6H5 3. 4CH3CONH- C6H5 4. 2-OCHC6H5
5. 3- OCHC6H5 6. 4- OCHC6H5 7. 3- OCH,4-OCH3- C6H4 8. 5-Br-2-OH- C6H4
9. 2-Br- C6H5 10. 3-Br- C6H5 11. 4-Br- C6H5 12. 2-Cl-6-F- C6H4
13. 4-Cl-3-NO2 14. 2-Cl- C6H5 15. 3-Cl- C6H5 16. 4-Cl- C6H5
17. 2-(4-Cl-SC6H5) 18. 3-CN- C6H5 19. 4-CN- C6H5 20. 2,3-Cl- C6H4
21. 2,4-Cl-C6H4 22. 2,6-Cl- C6H4 23. 3,5-Cl- C6H4 24. 4-(C2H5)2N- C6H5
25. 2,6-F-C6H4 26. 3,4-F- C6H4 27. 2,3-OH- C6H4 28. 2,4-OH- C6H4
29. 2,5-OH-C6H4 30. 3,4-OH-C6H4 31. 2,3-OCH3- C6H4 32. 2,4-OCH3- C6H4
33. 2,5-OCH3 34. 3,4- OCH3-C6H4 35. 3,5- OCH3- C6H4 36. 3,5- OCH3,4-OH- C6H4
37. 2,4-CH3-C6H4 38. 3,5-CH3-C6H4 39. 3-OC2H5-4-OH- C6H4 40. 2-F-C6H5
41. 3-F-C6H5 42. 4-F-C6H5 43. 2-OH- C6H5 44. 3-OH-C6H5
45. 4-OH-C6H5 46. 2-OH,3-OCH3- C6H4 47. 2-OH,4-OCH3- C6H4 48. 2-OH,5-OCH3-C6H4
49. 3-OH,4-OCH3 C6H4 50. 4-OH,3-OCH3-5NO2 51. 2-OH-5NO2 52. 4-CH(CH3)2-C6H5
53. 2-OCH3-C6H5 54. 3-OCH3-C6H5 55. 4-OCH3-C6H5 56. 4-CH3-C6H5
57. 2-CH3-C6H5 58. 3-CH3-C6H5 59. 4-SCH3-C6H5 60. 2-NO2-C6H5
61. 3-NO2-C6H5 62. 4-NO2-C6H5 63. 3-OC6H5 64. 4-CH(CH3)3- C6H5
65. 2,3,5-Cl C6H3 66. 3,4,5-F-C6H3 67. 4-CF3OCH3-C6H4 68. 4-CF3-C6H5
69. 2,3,4-OCH3-C6H3 70. 3,4,5-OCH3-C6H3 71. 2,4,6-OCH3-C6H3 72. 3-NO2-C6H5
73. C5H4O2 74. C9H10O3 75. C5H4OS


2.6 Synthesis of selected ligands 22
2.6.1 Synthesis of optimized thiazole derivatives
Step 1
Synthesis of 2-amino-5-aryl-5H thiazolo[ 4,3-b]-l,3,4-thiadiazole (1)
In 25ml RBF Aldehyde (0.02M) and thioglycolic acid (0.02M), thiosemicarbazide (0.022M) and 10ml of concentrated H2SO4 were taken. The reaction mixture was mixed and left overnight and the resulting suspension was neutralized with 40% NaOH solution till product gets precipitated out and this resulting compound 1was recrystallized from aqueous dioxane solution.
Synthesis of 1-phenyl-N-{5-phenyl-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl}methanimine derivatives(2):
A solution of compound 1 (0.01M) in ethanol (50ml) was taken in RBF and stirred vigorously for 15 minutes to this resulting solution concentrated H2SO4 (2ml) and aldehyde (0.01M) was added. The reaction mixture was irradiated in the synthetic microwave (Cata 4R) for 10min. The separated solid was filtered and recrystallized from ethanol.
Synthesis of 2-phenyl-3-{5-phenyl-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl}-1,3- thiazolidin-4-one derivatives (3):
In 25ml RBF compound, 2 (0.01M) and thioglycolic acid (0.01M) were taken and DMF 30ml was added and stirred. Resulting reaction mixture was irradiated in the microwave for 10 min at 750 watts. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and resulting solid was separated and recrystallized from benzene to get compound 1 to 23. Table 2 shown list of substituents in the synthesized set of molecules.
Table No. 2: List of Substituents in Synthesized set of molecules
Sr. No. R1 R2 Code
1. 4-Br-C6H4 -C6H4 B3
2. -C6H4 4-Cl-C6H4 C13
3. -C6H4 2-Cl-C6H4 C1
4. 3,4-(OCH3)-C6H4 2-Cl-C6H4 F1
5. 2-(OH)-C6H4 3-Cl-C6H4 O17
6. -C4H3O 3-OCH3-4-OH-C6H3 Q21
7. 4-N(CH3)2-C6H4 4-Cl-C6H4 L13
8. 2-(OH)-C6H4 4-Cl-C6H4 O13
9. -C4H3O 2-(OH)-C6H4 Q24
10. 4-Cl-C6H4 4-(OH)-C6H4 M9
11. 4-F-C6H4 -C4H3O H25
12. 3-Cl-C6H4 S-C4H3 R26
13. 3-(OCH3)-4-(OH)-C6H3 -C6H4 V3
14. 3,5-(OCH3)2-4-(OH)C6H2 -C6H4 U8
15. 3-Cl-C6H4 3-NO2-C6H4 A11
16. 2-Cl-C6H4 4-NO2-C6H4 A10
17. -C4H3O 3-OCH3-C6H4 Q22
18. -C4H3O -C7H5O2 Q30
19. 3-Cl-C6H4 S-C4H3 R25
20. 4-Cl-C6H4 S-C4H3 M26
21. 3-Cl-C6H4 3,4-(OCH3)-C6H4 R6
22. 3-(OCH3)-C6H4 4-Cl-C6H4 W13
23. 3-(OCH3)-C6H4 4-F-C6H4 W8

B3: 3-[5-(4-bromophenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-phenyl-1,3 thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Brown, Yield: 82%, m. p.: 192-194°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 474.94, IR: 1752 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1452 cm-1 (C=C), 2742.84 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1580 cm-1 (-N=CH) NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.95-7.35 (m, 9H, aromatic H), 4.95-5.90 (s, 2H, methine), 3.35 (s, 2H, methylene), 4.85 (s, 1H, ethylene)
C13: 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-{5-phenyl-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl}-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Yellow, Yield: 80%, m. p.: 178-180°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 430.99, IR: 1690 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1435 cm-1 (C=C), 2842 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1470 cm-1 (-N=CH), NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.90-7.25 (m, 9H, aromatic), 4.95-5.90 (s, 2H, methine), 3.38 (s, 2H, methylene), 4.95 (s, 1H, ethylene)
C1: 2-(2-chlorophenyl)-3-{5-phenyl-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl}-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Brown, Yield: 75%, m. p.: 186-188°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 430.99, IR: 1625 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1400 cm-1 (C=C), 2830 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1476 cm-1 (-N=CH) NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.95-7.20 (m, 9H, aromatic), 4.90-5.92 (s, 2H, methine), 3.30 (s, 2H, methylene), 4.90 (s, 1H, ethylene)
F1: 2-(2-chlorophenyl)-3-[5-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Lemon, Yield: 89%, m. p.: 162-164°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 492.02, IR: 1640 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1490 cm-1 (C=C), 2790 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1520 cm-1 (-N=CH) NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.52-7.15 (m, 7H, aromatic), 4.95-5.90 (s, 2H, methine), 3.33 (s, 2H, methylene), 4.85 (s, 1H, ethylene), 3.75 (d, 6H, methyl)
O17: 2-(3-chlorophenyl)-3-[5-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Yellow, Yield: 80%, m. p.: 228-230°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 447.97, IR: 1680 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1500cm-1 (C=C), 2810 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1580 cm-1 (-N=CH) NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.62-7.20 (m, 8H, aromatic), 4.95 (s, 1H, methine), 5.92 (s, 1H, methine), 3.38 (s, 1H, methylene), 4.75 (s, 1H, ethylene), 6.05 (s, 1H, aromatic C-OH)
Q21: 2-(3-ethoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-[5-(furan-2-yl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Black, Yield: 78%, m. p.: 192-194°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 447.54, IR: 1750 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1540 cm-1 (C=C), 2840 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1600 cm-1 (-N=CH) NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.05-7.30 (m, 6H, aromatic benzene and furan), 4.75 (s, 1H, ethylene), 5.15-5.92 (s, 2H, methine), 3.30 (s, 2H, methylene), 3.95 (s, 2H, methylene), 1.58 (s, 3H, methyl), 5.02 (s, 1H aromatic C-OH)
L13: 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-{5-[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl}-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Brown, Yield: 67%, m. p.: 156-158°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 475.04, IR: 1652 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1538 cm-1 (C=C), 2800 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1530 cm-1 (-N=CH) NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.45-7.20 (m, 8H, aromatic benzene), 4.80 (s, 1H, ethylene), 4.95-5.80 (s, 2H, methine), 3.30 (s, 2H, methylene), 2.95 (s, 6H, methyl N-CH3)
O13: 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-[5-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Brown, Yield: 67%, m. p.: 236-238°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 447.97, IR: 1760 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1540 cm-1 (C=C), 2830cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1680 cm-1 (-N=CH) NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.65-7.25 (m, 8H, aromatic benzene), 4.85 (s, 1H, ethylene), 4.05-4.70 (s, 2H, methine), 3.28 (s, 2H, methylene), 5.25 (s, 1H, aromatic C-OH)
Q24: 3-[5-(furan-2-yl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Black, Yield: 75%, m. p.: 216-218°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 403.49, IR: 1740 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1623 cm-1 (C=C), 2810 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1680 cm-1 (-N=CH), NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.60-7.30 (m, 7H, aromatic benzene and furan), 4.80 (s, 1H, ethylene), 5.20-5.80 (s, 2H, methine), 3.30 (s, 2H, methylene), 5.25 (s, 1H, aromatic C-OH)
M9: 3-[5-(4-chlorophenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Brown, Yield: 88%, m. p.: 138-140°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 447.97, IR: 1700 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1640 cm-1 (C=C), 2790 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1650 cm-1 (-N=CH), NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.55-7.25 (m, 8H, aromatic benzene), 4.85 (s, 1H, ethylene), 5.10-5.85 (s, 2H, methine), 3.38 (s, 2H, methylene), 6.05 (s, 1H, aromatic C-OH)
H25: 3-[5-(4-fluorophenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-(furan-2-yl)-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Yellow, Yield: 70 %, m. p.: 122-124°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 405.48, IR: 1688 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1589 cm-1 (C=C), 2690 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1580 cm-1 (-N=CH) NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.30-7.05 (m, 7H, aromatic benzene and furan), 4.82 (s, 1H, ethylene), 5.10-5.85 (s, 2H, methine), 3.35 (s, 2H, methylene)
R26: 3-[5-(3-chlorophenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-(thiophen-2-yl)-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Yellow, Yield: 72%, m. p.: 206-208°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 437.99, IR: 1750 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1670 cm-1 (C=C), 2560 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1540 cm-1 (-N=CH) NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.60-7.10 (m, 7H, aromatic benzene and thiophene), 4.85 (s, 1H, ethylene), 4.95-5.90 (s, 2H, methine), 3.30 (s, 2H, methylene)
V3: 3-[5-(3-ethoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-phenyl-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Brown, Yield: 83%, m. p.: 180-182°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 457.58, IR: 1620 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1560 cm-1 (C=C), 2860 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1490 cm-1 (-N=CH) NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.45-7.14 (m, 8H, aromatic benzene), 4.80 (s, 1H, ethylene), 4.90-5.85 (s, 2H, methine), 3.35 (s, 2H, methylene), 5.95 (s, 1H, aromatic C-OH), 3.98 (s, 2H, methylene), 1.75 (s, 3H, methyl)
U8: 3-[5-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-phenyl-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Yellow, Yield: 80%, m. p.: 230-232°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 473.58, IR: 1688 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1562 cm-1 (C=C), 2883 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1489 cm-1 (-N=CH) NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 5.95-7.10 (m, 7H, aromatic benzene), 4.85 (s, 1H, ethylene), 4.92-5.95 (s, 2H, methine), 3.28 (s, 2H, methylene), 5.98 (s, 1H, aromatic C-OH), 3.85 (s, 6H, methoxy)
A11: 3-[5-(3-chlorophenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Brown, Yield: 69 %, m. p.: 146-148°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 476.97, IR: 1679cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1575 cm-1 (C=C), 2896 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1523 cm-1 (-N=CH). NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.90-7.95 (m, 8H, aromatic benzene), 4.75 (s, 1H, ethylene), 4.90-5.92 (s, 2H, methine), 3.33 (s, 2H, methylene)
A10: 3-[5-(2-chlorophenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Brown, Yield: 70%, m. p.: 174-176°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 476.97, IR: 1590 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1456 cm-1 (C=C), 2675 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1563 cm-1 (-N=CH). NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 7.04-8.05 (m, 8H, aromatic benzene), 4.85 (s, 1H, ethylene), 4.95-5.90 (s, 2H, methine), 3.28 (s, 2H, methylene)
Q22: 3-[5-(furan-2-yl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Black, Yield: 78 %, m. p.: 176-178°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 417.52, IR: 1639 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1420 cm-1 (C=C), 2640 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1570 cm-1 (-N=CH). NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.50-7.30 (m, 7H, aromatic benzene and furan), 4.80 (s, 1H, ethylene), 5.10-5.95 (s, 2H, methine), 3.30 (s, 2H, methylene), 3.75 (s, 3H, methoxy)
Q30: 2-(2H-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-3-[5-(furan-2-yl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Black, Yield: 70%, m. p.: 240-242°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 431.50, IR: 1782 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1560 cm-1 (C=C), 2785 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1630 cm-1 (-N=CH). NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.45-7.25 (m, 6H, aromatic benzene and furan), 4.82 (s, 1H, ethylene), 5.15-5.85 (s, 2H, methine), 3.28 (s, 2H, methylene), 5.95 (s, 2H, 1,3-dioxole)
R25: 3-[5-(3-chlorophenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-(thiophen-2-yl)-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Yellow, Yield: 82%, m. p.: 234-236°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 437.99 IR: 1700 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1590 cm-1 (C=C), 2693 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1578 cm-1 (-N=CH). NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.65-7.05 (m, 7H, aromatic benzene and thiophene), 4.85 (s, 1H, ethylene), 4.95-5.95 (s, 2H, methine), 3.32 (s, 2H, methylene)
M26: 3-[5-(4-chlorophenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-(thiophen-2-yl)-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Brown, Yield: 70%, m. p.: 210-212°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 437.99, IR: 1665 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1545 cm-1 (C=C), 2530 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1540 cm-1 (-N=CH). NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.60-7.25 (m, 7H, aromatic benzene and thiophene), 4.82 (s, 1H, ethylene), 4.90-5.92 (s, 2H, methine), 3.35 (s, 2H, methylene)
R6: 3-[5-(3-chlorophenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-2-(3,4 dimethoxyphenyl)-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Brown, Yield: 85%, m. p.: 226-228°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 492.02, IR: 1675 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1553 cm-1 (C=C), 2542 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1580 cm-1 (-N=CH). NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ= 6.50-7.15 (m, 7H, aromatic benzene), 4.82 (s, 1H, ethylene), 4.92-5.85 (s, 2H, methine), 3.33 (s, 2H, methylene), 3.75 (s, 6H, methoxy)
W13: 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-[5-(3-methoxyphenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: White, Yield: 78%, m. p.: 170-172°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 462.00, IR: 1600 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1532cm-1 (C=C), 2520 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1560 cm-1 (-N=CH).NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ= 6.55-7.20 (m, 8H, aromatic benzene), 4.85 (s, 1H, ethylene), 4.92-5.88 (s, 2H, methine), 3.30 (s, 2H, methylene), 3.78 (s, 3H, methoxy)
W8: 2-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-[5-(3-methoxyphenyl)-5H-[1,3]thiazolo[4,3-b][1,3,4]thiadiazol-2-yl]-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one
Color: Brown, Yield: 80%, m. p.: 160-162°C, MASS: [M+1]+ 445.55 IR: 1750 cm-1 (C=O Str.), 1682cm-1 (C=C), 2540 cm-1 (Ar. CH), 1670 cm-1 (-N=CH). NMR: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz,): δ = 6.65-7.05 (m, 8H, aromatic benzene), 4.80 (s, 1H, ethylene), 4.85-5.90 (s, 2H, methine), 3.34 (s, 2H, methylene), 3.65 (s, 3H, methoxy)
2.8 Antitubercular Activity:
The synthesized molecules were evaluated for antimycobacterial activity by culturing Mycobacterium smegmatis (NCIM 5138) on Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco) containing 0.5% albumin, 0.085% NaCl, 0.2% glucose, 0.05% Tween 80, and 0.5% glycerol at 37°C for 48 hr to mid-log phase (optical density at 600 nm [OD600]= 0.5) MICs of antibiotics against Mycobacterium smegmatis were determined in Middlebrook 7H9 broth by the standard microdilution method. All synthesized derivatives were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and utilized for antimycobacterial assay in concentration range of (3.25-1000µgm/ml)

RESULTS: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Pocket modeling of SEC of Mycobacterium tuberculosis:
The binding pocket analysis was performed on the X-ray structure of the SEC from MTB downloaded from free protein database www.rcsb.org. Proviz module of Vlife MDS 4.4 was utilized to perform the pocket analysis. Electrostatic and hydrophobic map of the binding pocket of SEC was generated to identify the relative orientation of critical amino acids. Pocket modeling of SEC revealed the binding pocket of SEC is highly hydrophobic and ASP224, HIS534, and LYS115 are the three important amino acids required for the ATP binding. Fig. 2 showing the hydrophobic map of the active site of SEC of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. SEC runs protein export, which is driven by ATP as the energy source, inhibition of this ATP binding, or blocking three amino acids will inhibit the SEC and ultimately protein export. Binding pocket of SEC was found to be highly hydrophobic and U shaped. Molecules were designed with an intent so that they will retain necessary hydrophobicity and relative conformation with respect to the SEC of MTB. Molecules are developed keeping thiazole as the template, thiazole derivatives due presence of two heteroatoms which will act as an anchor and two aromatic rings will act as wings to the nucleus and capable of achieving the bioactive U or V-shaped conformation which is complementary to the binding site of SEC. Aromatic benzaldehydes are utilized to manipulate the required hydrophobic characters and from aromatic interaction with Histidine 534.
Screening based on the drug-like properties:
Pharmacokinetic properties of the molecules are an important factor in the conversion of any New Chemical Entity to the drug. Pre-assessment of this drug like properties is played a vital role in the selection of potential drug-like candidates from designed data set of the molecules. All the molecules in the designed set of thiazole derivatives were assessed for the Lipinski parameters like molecular weight, H-bond acceptor, H-bond donor, Rotatable bond logp and Predicted oral absorption. 23 derivatives were found to have desired pharmacokinetic properties and predicted oral absorption <70%. The selected 23 derivatives with the drug-like properties were given in the following table 3.
Table No. 3: Table showing the molecules having the desired drug-like properties
Sr. No. Compound Code Mole. Wt. H-Acce H-Donor Count RBC logP TPSA
(Å) Pre. % Oral Abs.
1 A10 476.988 4 0 4 4.738 44.81 93.54
2 A11 476.988 4 0 4 4.738 81.4 80.91
3 B3 476.442 1 0 3 4.939 35.57 96.72
4 C1 431.99 1 0 3 4.83 35.57 96.72
5 C13 431.99 1 0 3 4.83 35.57 96.72
6 F1 492.043 3 0 7 4.847 54.04 90.35
7 H25 405.498 2 0 3 3.908 46.57 85.26
8 L13 475.059 2 0 6 4.896 41.37 94.72
9 M9 447.99 2 1 4 4.535 58.63 88.77
10 M26 438.019 1 0 3 4.891 35.57 96.72
11 O13 447.99 2 1 4 4.535 58.63 88.77
12 O17 447.99 2 1 4 4.535 58.63 88.77
13 Q21 447.56 3 1 7 3.873 81 81.05
14 Q22 417.534 2 0 5 3.778 57.95 89.00
15 Q24 433.533 3 1 6 3.483 81 81.05
16 Q30 431.517 1 0 3 3.498 67.18 85.82
17 R6 492.043 3 0 7 4.847 54.04 90.35
18 R25 421.952 1 0 3 4.423 48.71 92.19505
19 R26 438.019 1 0 3 4.891 35.57 96.72
20 U8 491.588 5 1 8 4.038 77.1 82.40
21 V3 457.598 3 1 7 4.28 67.86 85.58
22 W8 445.562 3 0 5 4.324 44.81 93.54
23 W13 462.017 2 0 5 4.838 44.81 93.54

Molecular Docking:
Molecular docking was utilized to predict the potential active inhibitors from the designed set of ligands. Grip-based docking analysis was performed with maintaining the SEC in rigid conformation while ligands in flexible conformation. All the design set of molecules were found to be binding to the same binding site to that of ATP in SEC. The designed set of molecules were found to be interacting with HIS 534 and ASP224 via formation with hydrogen bond interaction and pi-stacking interaction. Binding interactions of selected 23 molecules were summarized in the following table no. 4, whereas Fig. 3, 4, 5 and 6 showing most active conformation of molecule M26, U8, R26 and A10 (Ball and Stick) with PDB ID 4UAQ respectively.
Table No. 4: Binding interactions and energy of docked molecules
Sr. No. Compound Code Binding Energy H-bond Pi-Stacking
1. A10 -33.43 HIS534 HIS534
2. A11 -0.12 HIS534 HIS534
3. B3 -35.40 HIS534 HIS534
4. C1 -7.41 ASP224 HIS534
5. C13 -2.31 HIS534
HIS534 HIS534
6. F1 -33.32 HIS534 HIS534
7. L13 -8.74 HIS534 HIS534
8. M9 -37.54 ASP219 HIS534
9. M26 -38.54 ASP224 HIS534
10. O13 -11.91 GLN498 HIS534
11. O17 -9.81 HIS534 HIS534
12. Q21 23.92 ASP219 HIS534
13. Q22 -11.97 HIS534 HIS534
14. Q24 -11.03 HIS534 HIS534
15. Q30 -3.89 HIS534 HIS534
16. R25 -2.51 HIS534 HIS534
17. R26 -4.66 ASP224 HIS534
18. R6 -11.74 HIS534 HIS534
19. U8 -0.21 HIS534 HIS534
20. V3 -36.40 HIS534 HIS534
21. H25 -8.37 HIS534 HIS534
22. W8 -33.40 ASP224 HIS534
23. W13 -31.56 HIS534 HIS534

Biological activity:
The anti-mycobacterial activity of the synthesized derivatives was determined against the standard Mycobacterium smegmatis (NCIM No: 5138). The anti-mycobacterial activity of the synthesized derivatives was determined against the standard Mycobacterium smegmatis (NCIM No: 5138). Mycobacterium smegmatis is an organism belonging to Mycobacterium family having nearly about 80% genome similarity with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Isoniazid is utilized as the positive standard for the anti-mycobacterial activity. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the all-23 derivatives are summarized in Fig 7. All the compounds have shown good to moderate activity against the tested strain. Compound R 26, Q30 and M9 are showed maximum antitubercular activity (MIC: 62.5 μgm/ml). Excellent activity of the M9 and R 26 indicates halogens are having the positive effect on the antitubercular activity, which activity of Q30 is interesting finding which indicates substitution of the heterocyclic nucleus will also potentiate the activity. Derivative L13 showed good activity (MIC: 125μgm/ml), which justifies the substitution of halogen in the aromatic ring. A10, C13, F1, O13, O17, Q21, Q22, Q24, R25, R6, U8, and W13 are moderately active compounds with (MIC: 500μgm/ml).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Conclusion:
Attempts to design and develop molecules targeting secretory systems of Mycobacterium tuberculosis yielded following significant findings. Identification and validation of secretory systems as targets for anti-tubercular drug design and discovery has been successfully carried out. Out of three protein export systems associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis SEC protein export system has been utilized successfully for the development of antitubercular against which are selective and can be utilized against all resistant form of tuberculosis. Protein export systems are conserved systems and they are not having any isoform in human so targeting protein export systems will be the potential route for development of selective and active antitubercular agents. Pocket modeling of the active site or binding site of SEC revealed the interesting fact about size and shape of the binding pocket of SEC and which signified the development of hydrophobic ligands for binding with SEC of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Based on pocket modeling data and Literature survey total 5184 molecules were designed around thiazole scaffold via the change in the different aromatic benzaldehyde structures. 5625 designed molecules were further scrutinized via Lipinski drug-like properties and toxicity profile using OCHEM and for binding efficiency using molecular docking analysis. Results of above all three analysis yielded 23 potent, selective molecules which are successfully synthesized via reaction of an aromatic aldehyde, thiosemicarbazide and thioglycolic acid. All the molecules are successfully synthesized using microwave assisted synthesis which improved the yield and reduced to the time of reaction than the procedures reported in the literature. All the synthesized 23 derivatives were characterized via all physicochemical methods, Melting point and IR, and NMR spectroscopy. Halogen substituted derivatives showed significant activity which indicates substitution of an electron withdrawing group in aryl ring will potentiate anti-mycobacterial activity. M26, U8 and R26 molecules have significant desirable biological activity and specific interactions with SEC, Further optimization of these leads is necessary for the development of potential antitubercular drug like candidates. These potential drug candidates with specific SEC inhibitory properties have resulted from the utilization of integration of pocket modeling and virtual screening.


Keywords: M. tuberculosis, Sec, ESX, Docking, Anti-mycobacterial, MDR, Pocket Modeling.


Prafulla Balkrishna Choudhari, Shivaratna V Khare, Siddharth P Phalle, Santosh S Kumbhar, Sambhaji Masal, Rakesh P Dhavale, Durgacharan A Bhagwat, Atual M Kadam, Sujata P Choudahri. Optimization Of Thiazolidone Scaffolds Using Pocket Modelling For Development Of Potential Secretary System Inhibitors of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. . 2019; 16(2): 0-0

Corresponding Author: Prafulla Balkrishna Choudhari, India


TOOLS
Full Text PDF
Print
Download citation
RIS
EndNote
BibTex
Medlars
Procite
Reference Manager
Share with email
Share
Send email to author

Similar articles
Google Scholar