. 2022; 19(4): 0-0

Efficacy of lidocaine local anesthesia on pain perception during amniocentesis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Ebraheem Albazee1, Reem Sayad2, Mohammad Alnifise3, Abdulrahman Al-Anzi4, Faisal Alshammari5, Gheith Rasheed3, Ahmed Samy6, Haifa Al-Jundy7, Marwah Ghazi Bintalib8, Ahmed Abu-Zaid9
1Kuwait Institute for Medical Specializations (KIMS), Kuwait City, Kuwait
2Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assuit, Egypt
3Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
4Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jahra Hospital, Jahra, Kuwait
6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
8Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
9College of Graduate Health Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine local analgesia on maternal pain reduction during amniocentesis.
Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception and updated in July 2022. The included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated for risk of bias via the Cochrane tool. The primary outcome was pain perception using the 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS), and summarized as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was done according to the mode of administration. Meta-analysis was done via Review Manager software.
Results: We included five RCTs totaling 1004 women; of these, 502 patients were allocated to the lidocaine group, and 502 patients were allocated to the control group. Overall, there was no significant difference between both groups (n=5 RCTs, MD=-0.21, 95% CI [-0.48, 0.07], p=0.80). The pooled analysis was homogeneous (Chi-square p=0.13, I-square=43%). Subgroup analysis according to the mode of administration showed that pain perception was not significantly different between both groups when lidocaine was used as injection (n=3 RCTs, MD=-0.26, 95% CI [-0.76, 0.23], p=0.29) or non-injection (n=2 RCTs, MD=-0.18, 95% CI [-0.55, 0.18], p=0.33). The pooled analyses were heterogeneous (Chi-square p=0.05, I-square=66%) and homogeneous (Chi-square p=0.27, I-square=19%), respectively.
Conclusion: There was no significant difference concerning pain perception between the lidocaine local anesthesia group and the control group. The majority of women reported just minimal discomfort during amniocentesis. Counseling should educate patients that the pain they might experience during amniocentesis is comparable to venous blood sampling.

Keywords: Amniocentesis, Local Anesthesia, Pain, Pregnancy, Analgesia, Meta-analysis


Ebraheem Albazee, Reem Sayad, Mohammad Alnifise, Abdulrahman Al-Anzi, Faisal Alshammari, Gheith Rasheed, Ahmed Samy, Haifa Al-Jundy, Marwah Ghazi Bintalib, Ahmed Abu-Zaid. Efficacy of lidocaine local anesthesia on pain perception during amniocentesis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. . 2022; 19(4): 0-0

Corresponding Author: Ahmed Abu-Zaid, United States of America


TOOLS
Print
Download citation
RIS
EndNote
BibTex
Medlars
Procite
Reference Manager
Share with email
Share
Send email to author

Similar articles
Google Scholar